chiswick; a reality check. being greeted with "oh, you have a table till 8" rather than "you have a booking for 6" is not the best start. prior warnings of your impending ejection is not welcoming and does not go down well when it takes 25 minutes to order an initial drink.
intrigued by the crispy chicken small plate, i made this my first course. the dish was aesthetically underwhelming consisting of, what looked like, four pieces of kfc with a side of nando's mayonnaise. perhaps i had expectations of slices of succulent breast meat in a mysterious crispy shell, who knows, but i did not expect two wings, a drumstick and a thigh fillet encased in beige batter. i tucked in, hoping i would be enlightened by an amazing amalgamation of unique flavours. i wasn't. it embodied the taste and texture of fast-food, plain and simple, yet with a not so simple price tag. let me note here the pretentious feeling of negotiating kfc style chicken with a knife and fork in a fine dining restaurant. this is not what i got dressed up for. the main of lamb shoulder appeared far more visually pleasing but that was as far as it went. beyond the 'surprise' factor of having a large mass of meat delivered to the table, the dish was empty. food, for which good money is paid, should compel you to question how it was done and appreciate your own inability create the dish. the truth is, though, i had a good idea of how this was cooked and could i re-create the dish myself? dare i say. the dish was none other than tender, slow cooked lamb meat from oven to plate with no additional (detectable) flavours. to be frank, the experience of chomping through so much plain meat became tedious. even the chickpeas tucked beside the shoulder were a disappointment strangely, because they tasted like chickpeas with no, or little, masking of their blandness. i thought perhaps the side of chips would provide a welcome break, and they did, but i am keen to know why the accompanying dip had an unusual stoney-like complexion, yet no flavour. thoroughly unimpressed by the experience, i failed to see where the 'added value’ or creativity existed in any of the food to warrant the price. it all seemed rather lazy. it is regrettable that my parting thoughts were of wasted money rather than satisfaction. i have no doubt that chiswick will continue to do well, nonetheless, as i do not believe that the type of people who frequent the venue do so for the food.